Conspiracy Detector: Orange

Homeland security alertSo why were all the polls in New Hampshire wrong? Supposedly Hilary was on her last legs; a solid loss in New Hampshire and her own staff was planning to tell her to pull out of the race. The polls all had her losing by 5-13 points, yet we’re supposed to believe that just because her eyes got a little watery in response to a question that thousands of voters in New Hampshire changed their minds and said, “Hey, that Hilary would make a great president. I’m voting for her!” Sorry, I’m just not buying it. They use electronic voting machines in New Hampshire primaries, don’t they? Hmph.

In other news, I’m still looking for an adequate way to collect notes on my cases and stay on top of The Caseload that Ate My Brain. I know someone out here has been in this pickle; how did you get out of it? Still seeking suggestions…

Comments

2 Comments so far. Leave a comment below.
  1. W.,

    I’m not quite sure why everyone is so shocked. More than one comment has been made on the idea that McCain ended up with a lot of Obama’s votes. I don’t think the voters in New Hampshire were worried about Obama’s chances and instead decided to have an influence over who would be the R nominee.

  2. ti,

    Hey, W! That’s some pretty sharp analysis — hadn’t thought of that. Obama voters going for McCain would explain things pretty well, but it’s so not as fun as a conspiracy theory!

Add Your Comments

Required
Required
Tips

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <ol> <ul> <li> <strong>

Your email is never published nor shared.

Ready?